Not-so Smart Advice
In the February issue of SmartMoney, writer Janet Paskin details ways investors can effectively fund retirement plans. Overall, I thought the article was very informative, but I disagreed with her comments that whole life insurance would be the “wrong direction,” and a poor investment vs. buying term insurance and investing the difference.
The newest whole life products have very competitive internal rates of return when compared to similar no- or low-risk investments. For example, one New York-based company has a product where the insured can specify how many years to pay the premiums. The cash value on a 20-year, $500,000 whole life policy for a preferred 45-year old non-smoking male would have a rate of return of 4.5% at age 65 and 5.05% at age 70—certainly an excellent return in today’s market.
Notably, cash values of permanent life insurance can be used to enhance retirement income on a tax-favored basis. The example I’ve cited above, using a 28% tax bracket, would generate a return equivalent to 6.25% at age 65 with little or no risk.
Something Ms. Paskin also failed to highlight in her article is that with whole life insurance, the insured has a guaranteed death benefit that he or she can never outlive, while term insurance is only available for a specified period. That’s something to think about when planning not only for your retirement, but also the retirement of a spouse you leave behind at your death.
Here’s something else to think about as you pursue a strategy of buying term and investing the difference, as Ms. Paskin advises: what happens when the individual is unable to maximize the contributions to the retirement accounts or experiences severe market adjustments and cannot accumulate the needed capital to retire? A planned retirement at age 55 may be pushed to 65 or even age 70. Buying insurance at these ages may be expensive or may be unavailable due to changing health conditions. If whole life had been purchased at a younger age, these problems would not be a concern.
The volatile stock market reminded us this week that along with any investment comes investment risk. The whole life policies available today certainly deserve to be considered as a tool for safe and secure long-term returns—and contrary to Ms. Paskin’s advice—a SMART direction to take when planning for retirement.







3 Comments to "Not-so Smart Advice"
Jerry McClellan
May 8, 2008
Marvin H. Feldman, CLU, ChFC, RFC, President and CEO of the LIFE Foundation
May 15, 2008
Julissa
December 20, 2008